Exam Friday November 7th#
Today you’ll make the first exam assignment covering Statically indeterminate structures including its prerequisites. For more information about the exam see the assessment information in course information
Exam assignment#
Your own submission and its grading can be found here: exam assignment Statically indeterminate structures 1. The exam assignment was provided as follows:
Given is the structure as shown in the figure below.
Exercise
Show that this structure is statically indeterminate to the second degree.
Solution
For this structure, the external static indeterminacy is equal to the internal static indeterminacy.
There are 8 unknowns and 6 equilibrium equations, making the structure statically indeterminate to the second degree.
Exercise
Provide two alternative valid variants to make this structure statically determinate for the purpose of the force method or displacement method with statically indeterminate displacements. Provide two different variants: your adjustments must each modify a different part of the structure. For each of the variants, provide the necessary equation(s) to determine the statically indeterminate force(s) or statically indeterminate displacement(s).
Oplossing
Adding a hinge in the same segment or releasing a two-force-element in the same segment does not count as a valid variant.
A few potential variants are:
Veelgemaakte fouten
Fig. 186 Structure not statically determinate#
Fig. 187 Statically indeterminate force / displacement missing#
Exercise
Determine the vertical support reaction in \(\rm{A}\) using the force-or displacement method
Oplossing
As an example, the force method has been applied using the following statically determinate system, but other methods are also acceptable:
The effect of temperature can be taken into account by a kinematically equivalent load on \(\rm{ADC}\):
This must be applied at both ends of \(\rm{ADC}\) to obtain a constant curvature.
The elongation of \(\rm{BD}\) can now be found using the elongation of a bar:
The displacement \(w_{\rm{D}}^{\rm{BD}}\) can now be found using Williot’s theorem:
The displacement \(w_{\rm{D}}^{\rm{ADC}}\) and rotation \(\varphi_{\rm{A}}\) can now be found using the forget‑me‑nots:
Solving for the displacement conditions gives:
The vertical reaction in \(\rm{A}\) can now be determined using the equilibrium equations:
Veelgemaakte fouten
Fig. 188 Displacements due to forces in two-force member forgotten#
Fig. 189 Rotation of two-force member not taken into account (Williot not used)#
Fig. 190 Kinematically equivalent moment doesn’t give correct curvature#
Fig. 191 Express forces and displacements in other unknowns than the statically indeterminate ones#
Fig. 192 Solving just one equilibrium or compatibility equation#